Tuesday, May 31, 2011

$100,000+ Salary, Work From Home, Always Hiring.

Were you just laid off? Fired? Let go? Or do you hate your job, and hate working for some jerk who makes money off of your labor? Are you living hand-to-mouth, or having a hard time saving for your kids' college funds? Or are you just plain looking for a new career that offers opportunities for creativity, flexibility, and a demand for strong moral principles? Well then we have just the thing for you...”


Does this sound familiar? Well, that's because it is. Every day our email inboxes and unconscious minds are spammed with pyramid schemes promising easy success at no personal cost. They approach our every inner desire; from a desire for creativity, emotion, and “the erotic” (as Audre Lorde put it) in our daily lives, to an appeal to the Weberian “Protestant work ethic”or even Marx's prediction that people will always find happiness through being in control of their lives and livelihood.


Here's the catch. This is actually available. It has been for decades, in the form of mom-and-pop grow shops. That's right, I'm talking about commercial marijuana growing.


I'm not writing to preach about the benefits of marijuana, or to glorify its production. It is illegal and has been so for quite a long time. However, in order to discuss why people do it, I must explain some of the benefits a grower receives.


First off and most importantly, marijuana cultivation, when done on a small scale in private residences, can be both discreet and very profitable. An experienced grower can pull anywhere from $5,000-$50,000 every two months out of a functioning operation, with little risk of being caught. Secondly, plant care at the level needed for indoor horticulture at a competitive level is very demanding and requires an extreme amount of attention and research. Their marketability, profit margins, and professional reputations are dependent on high quality harvests, which require the best possible care on a daily basis. No one can put in that kind of effort, then get that kind of a reward for their efforts, and not feel emotionally attached to their labor. It's just plain not possible.


So what does this mean, from a sociological standpoint? Why do people grow marijuana illegally? Well, each of the attributes I've listed relate both to pyramid scheme advertising headlines and to a separate core principle of sociological thought. The sociologists I have chosen to refer to are Marx, Weber, Durkheim, and Lorde, though I have not yet found a single acclaimed scholar whose ideas do not directly relate to this issue.


Karl Marx's big stick with the modern world was that laborers were and still are getting further separated from their labor. In other words, you might work as a machine operator, but you don't make the airplane. You make a little piece that no one will ever appreciate unless it fails, and then it's your ass on the line. Or you might work as a teacher, but you don't make your study plans. You have a list of objectives, requirements, and often times, even expected subject matter that you're supposed to teach. You don't make a house, you might just install the plumbing, hammer on the roof or plant the shrubs around it all day. You don't get to look the consumer of your product in the eye and say, “I have done you a service this day, and I appreciate you trading me worth for worth; money for my food in exchange for my time, hands, and mind.” Where is the pride in this?


Well, as a marijuana farmer, this is not a problem. The time investment is huge, but that's because you have to learn and perfect every step of production. Every new thing you learn adds money to your paycheck, and every mistake you make costs you greatly. This daily, hands on experience that uses both mind and body creates a strong bond with the finished product and with the production system itself. It's said that a grower who sticks with it more than a couple years will always, always go back, out of sheer passion for the work. Is that something that the Auto industry can claim?


Instead of preaching to you about Weber and the Protestant work ethic, I'd like to share with you a short story that will stick with me for the rest of my life. I'm sure you've heard it, and even played out it's role yourself.


About a month and a half ago, a “mid-level” marijuana smuggling ring into Cheney was broken up by the State Drug Task Force. The 28 year old “leader” of the ring was accused of laundering $380,000 in the last year through Northern Quest Casino. What caught my attention with this case was the comments responding to it. There were the short, stereotypical, to be expected comments, like, “Good, he got what he deserved!” And, “Legalize it, man! It's at worst no worse than alcohol!” But the ones that really caught my eye were from older, law abiding members of the community. They went something like this.


I've worked hard to provide for my wife and children. I've been a ______ manufacturer for fifteen years now. I'm astonished and horrified that this kid was clearing in a year tax free what I take home in a decade! I've paid my taxes, worked hard, saved paychecks, and followed the law. Where are my tax dollars going? Why do I personally pay for an anti drug effort that only allows children to make a mockery of my values and my life's work?”


If this response doesn't sum up, then allow me: Weber's belief that what America feels makes America strong is hard work, deferred pleasure, and seeing to the welfare of your family before all else. I do know that many, many people have started growing marijuana because of feelings like these. If an adult doesn't believe that marijuana is innately evil or particularly harmful, the temptation to add a few extra hours to your workday for a much greater contribution to your nest egg is powerful indeed. This is why the majority of the marijuana historically consumed in the United States is produced by small time growers who are often middle aged and have families--- true mom-and-pop shops. They blend in with the community; the parents still have regular jobs, the kids go to school and soccer practice, and often don't even know that mommy and daddy are breaking the law in order to save for Harvard. They are the embodiment of the Protestant work ethic.


Durkheim's most referenced work is Suicide, where he examines suicide rates across national boundaries and within different faith communities in order to potentially investigate social reasons for people committing this final act of escape. What he suggests is that there are two types of glue that hold communities together: a physical connection, in terms of person to person contact (which I don't really examine here), and also in terms of familial and social bonding, and an innate sharing of values, ideals, and “norms” that give people definition within the group and some conceptual framework for acting out their lives.


The Drug War is a cause and symptom of a serious social disorder. For the time being we'll ignore it's causes, and focus on the problems it causes in turn. At its most basic level, the Drug War is fighting against what people do in their private lives. In other words, a significant percentage of the population is and will always do drugs; moreover, they will believe it is their right to pursue pleasure or numb pain as they and they alone see fit.


The idea that regulation will reduce rates is fallacious: the more risk involved in an enterprise, the more profitable it becomes. The more profitable it becomes, the more people will want to get their piece of the pie. Both trends have been historically validated... marijuana production and cost varies highly state-to-state, but rates of consumption are actually comparatively stable. That means the government is fighting against basically a completely uncontrollable market variable.The belief in free will and the desire to succeed in this case conflicts with the underlying assertion that the majority has the right to rule.


Similarly, the idea that people have a right to seek pleasure or freedom from pain conflicts fundamentally with current drug policy. Regardless of the cause of the desire to consume a mood and mind altering substance, the fact remains that people will usually act in their own perceived best interest, and both of these behaviors are, in the most basic sense, attempts to improve one's quality of life. The conflict between an individual's desire to “do good” and to help himself or herself obviously and understandably causes great tension on many levels, for both the individuals and their families.


Basically this means that the larger the size of a chunk of the population that rebels against the mainstream based on claimed similar values, the greater the level of stress on both the system and the individual members on either side of the debate. This state of “anomie” is caused by societal normlessness, because both sides have a seemingly equally viable claim to this country's unifying ideals. Durkheim specifically studied this anomic state by measuring suicide, but it was intended to be somewhat applicable to social disorder in general, and is treated as such by scholars. If we are classifying grey market operations as a social disorder, then the individual choice to join the grey market should arguably be understood through similar mechanisms --- A polar cultural understanding of right and wrong on this issue. Simply put, if making money, being happy, caring for your family, and loving your job is “right”, then why is growing pot wrong? And if protecting your children from drug dealers and tolerating discomfort for some greater good (such as saving for the future or giving up your recreation for the sake of your family) is “right”, then why is this supporting this allegedly destructive pasttime “right”? It's not that people have different core values, it's that they disagree on right and wrong.


Finally, the plants themselves are fragrant and aesthetically appealing. Viewing and working with them can be compared as everything from a spiritual journey to a lover's embrace. It's not something you can understand until you've done it, much like caring for a pet or taking a beautiful woman on a date. It is a job as well as a personification of Lorde's concept of “the erotic”... the idea that life's true beauties are an almost visceral knowledge – when we see a child laugh, or hug a parent, or make love to a partner, we know in our gut that something is right and good. It is a powerful knowledge that defies conscious, intellectual examination. And once you grow marijuana for a while, you feel the tingle, too. You have the knowledge. Living, fragrant, sparkling flowers are undeniably and unfathomably beautiful, and bringing this beauty into the world just feels good.


Basically, I could go on and on about this. This is a profession that is caused and propogated by the society we live in, and the more we fight against it, the stronger its appeal becomes, and the better its practicioners learn to hide. Whether it's to numb the pain of a soulless job, or to block out the screaming children or the aching joints; whether it is to practice your freedom, or just to unwind at the end of the day and laugh a little more, it is all spawned from the same core beliefs that drive our culture and our country: freedom, hard work, and the pursuit of happiness.

7 comments:

  1. The true American Ideal - instant gratification. You do raise some good points in your discussion, but you seem to avoid the true question at hand - why do people choose to do drugs.
    You argue that people use them for a plethora of reasons - "to feel good," and so on - but using an artificial substance or even a "natural" substance like the majority of people think marijuana is (while in fact a vast majority of the marijuana on the streets has been laced with countless other chemicals to enhance its effects - and this is where most people get confused, so I will go slow for you - even if you grown your own, the seeds can be altered on a genetic level) is still unnatural.
    No matter where your theological beliefs originate from, maybe some "God" tells you what is right, maybe your morals come from no-where or maybe you do not have any morals at all, but no matter what using a substance to alter your persona or thoughts is not natural.
    Osho states that is order for a person to truly be Real, they must let go of the social constraints which hold them in place. That which keeps them from Being. Now when he refers to being "Real" - there is the "real self" which we portray to others, and then there is the Real self which we Are.

    Substances, no matter if they are "natural" or if they are made in a laboratory, they change who that person is. I have seen many different substances change people, destroy their lives - but there is nothing that can compete with being true to yourself. A substance can "make a situation better" when in reality it only makes that situation appear to be better - it does not change what anyone else does, it alters your perception of the reality and distorts your interactions with those around you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really like the connection you made between a grower and their plants.That kind of connection people have with their work is totally lacking in this nation of service industries.To our pschological and societal detriment I would imagine.

    However, I would have a concern with the route that such a stoked interest in this grey market might have.

    If you take any multi national corporation like starbucks for instance, they had to start somewhere. To be so successful there was probably one Starbucks coffee shop once upon a time and there where probably owners and coffee lovers who operated the store and made coffee with somewhere close to the same amount of love and attention that your "mom and pop" growers gave their plants.

    This dedication created success in Starbuck's case and now we have a massive corporation that spreads the alienation from work in it's employees that we are trying to avoid.

    Simply put, if marijuana were legalized (or even made more easy to attain) might it possibly lose the very substantial kind of appeal that exists on that "mom and pop shop" level?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well Star,

    I was specifically trying to not get into why people do drugs, but the argument that seeking altered mind states is "not natural" is false... It has been exhibited by many different species in nature. for one example look up "black lemur BBC drugs" on youtube.

    second is the concern that most drugs are laced. this is patently not true in our part of the country. in ares like the south and around the border, where quality marijuana is less expensive than, say, quality cocaine, marijuana is laced. However In our high production area, this is incredibly infrequent... is an attempt by dealers to boost the efficacy of a substandard product, and it only works on the incredibly stupid. Trust me, it only took one accident for me to figure out what PCP tastes like.

    ReplyDelete
  4. accidentally hit enter... gotta have the comment in two parts. Anyways, the frequency of lacing in our part of the country is very low, and several animal species actively pursue altered mind states. I mean, even my dog will go knock over and lap up beer cans if I leave them on the floor too long, and I drink shit so you can bet it's not for the flavor.

    As to concerns about substances negatively altering people's behaviors, what about Prozac? Adderal? Xanax? The reality is that many peoples' "natural" behaviors and conditions negatively affect their functionality in the world at large.

    I had my license to grow and consume marijuana because of a crippling medical disability that is unresponsive to most treatment. My options are literally to either smoke pot or live out the rest of my days on disability in a trailer. Compared to the life I didn't feel was worth living, I'm perfectly happy to have people think i'm a little bit stupid.

    I can't answer why "people" do drugs. I can answer that almost any substance out there that alters your body chemistry in some way has the ability to be used medically, and also has a downside. Even Tylenol is hard on your liver, and coffee on your heart. The question in ANY application of a pharmacological solution to a personal problem, medical, psychological or otherwise, is if the benefits outweigh the costs.

    You're free to agree or disagree as you like. This wasn't my original point. My original point is that marijuana production (structurally) is at least partially an attempt to a need (soft drug production) in a system that both creates the niche (both in terms of creating a product demand and causing the economic conditions that encourage entering an illegal market) and punishes the people in it. The ideological issues and questions of right or wrong are secondary concerns because, quite frankly, in this substance's case the negative effects for people who start smoking over the age of 21 i believe are minimal. I have the journal articles from Neurology Today if you'd like proof... As in I actually have tried to study the effects of this substance as they are described across multiple studies. I can also quote psychological studies, studies revolving around clinical social work, criminology studies, and pulmonary studies. And my conclusion is that the substance, even when used heavily, is inherently minimally harmful. Therefore, the things that keep it illegal are authoritarian ideologies and misperceptions about its use, NOT statistical data.

    I'd encourage you to look around more, and see what you can see. I don't claim to have the final word, only to explain that not everyone feels that complete rejection of any personal care, medical or otherwise, is the only path to self actualization.

    Bob, that is a huge concern as well, and one that is trying to be addressed in the legislature. the bills that have been pressed in Cali, Oregon and Washington recently have included tax measures and regulation standards that follow the Northern California production model, meaning it basically only allows for smaller scale, artisan cultivation. without those safeguards, what you suggest (that businesses will take it over) is GUARANTEED to happen. basically, the only way any legislation will be pushed for at all is if it includes measures to prevent a corporate takeover of the new industry. Otherwise, the people who foot the bill for pushing the law end up working themselves out of a job. this is also why almost all illegal growers are against reforming the laws.

    ReplyDelete
  5. one final note. Star, your comment suggests that there is one, objective reality and one path to true self actualization. I challenge that. I challenge the idea that drugs are always bad or negative or destructive, every shape and form. Even meth is a trade... for amazing euphoria, for an amazing feeling on the inside, you trade your outer life. in other words, it is a full redefinition of reality as an internal and not an external process. Though they do not have a house, car, or life to speak of, they ARE trying to find something that works for them, and they are getting SOME benefit.

    Is reality an internal process? is it an external process? or is speaking in absolutes at all the problem? Is messing with your body chemistry messing with your ability to fulfill yourself, or does it help open and expand your mind? You obviously feel one way, and, seeing as I consider taking psychadelic mushrooms to be one of the most positive and spiritual experiences of my life, feel another.

    In your experiences, you have learned your lessons, and in mine, I have learned mine. But, as Foucault would say, just because you ascribe to the dominant ideology doesn't mean my attempts at defining an effective counter ideology are invalid; instead, the very process of defining and redefining some shared reality is the nature of human life itself. Don't accuse me of lazy, self serving, or in other words, sub-human, thinking because I'm not satisfied with the blanket statement, "everything that alters your state of consciousness is inherently evil." It is an idea that has been emphasized in our culture incredibly recently (as in the last 100 years), and has a very different historical context in our society than in many different parts of the world. For instance, prosecuting mind altering substances has ALWAYS been linked to racism in the US. Betcha didn't know that... but why do you think crack cocaine has a prison sentence 5 times longer than powder? YUP. It's sure not because of major pharmacological differences, I can tell ya that much.

    Did you know that some indigenous tribes in Northern Russia still believe that when you die and go to heaven you fry on mushrooms and have sex all day for eternity? But no, you're right. They're all backward heathens who have never found a definition of reality, a means of actualizing themselves, that works for them in the thousands of years they've been stomping around up there.

    See what I mean? Don't be racist. nobody likes a racist.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It, in all honesty, was not my intention to argue the validity of the use of substances - for there can be no argument, the law is clear and defined in black and white terms.

    I am not going to pretend to stand on a pedestal in attempt to preach some form of philosophy dictating the correct way to live. I am not going to say how anyone should experience reality.

    The reality we all live is relative. We perceive every interaction and altercation differently. We learn from those interactions in different ways.

    The path we choose to take in order to define ourselves and our realities is one which only that individual can answer. The question becomes what path do we take - the easy path with fewer obstacles and, aided by substances we avoid the heartache and pain our reality provides us - or - the path with which we all face the pain and we become stronger for facing the challenges of reality.

    I cannot say which is right or better - but the philosophical question which is still left is the altered persona of the individual using the substance.

    If a person is left uninhibited by social constraints and their person left unaltered due to an unnatural substance - what is the ideal they are searching for by the use of that substance?

    If a person is left with nothing but pain in their life it would be natural to seek the easy way out - to completely "zoik" out of reality and not even acknowledge that which is happening in their life. But then and again there are the individuals, who some call stupid or crazy, face that pain head on.

    Most modern philosophy will say that is a choice we all must face on an individual basis. That 1000 words may be sang and only 1 understood yet the meaning of all is clear through the interpretation of that 1.

    ReplyDelete
  7. mmkay. well...

    Addiction is classified as a disease of the midbrain caused by activation of a latent genetic predisposition to high tolerance levels, according to the American Medical Association. That is, if you'll accept their word as valid, which I highly doubt at this point.

    Yeah, "drugs" ruin lives. but for about 90-94% of the population, marijuana is about as dangerous as coffee. For the minority, it's one HELL of a quick way back to the straw or needle. It's like having an itch on the bottom of your foot and tickling it with a feather. And I just so happen to fall in that 6-10%, and I'm going to treatment for this disease that has run in my family for as many generations as we can trace. Not that it's any of your business.

    To say that the law dictates right and wrong is plain ridiculous, man. At one point, being gay, black, or a woman was basically illegal. Equally silly is the claim that philosophers have any basis for understanding and treating diseases. If you wanna moralize cancer that's up to you man. Personally I can't stand diabetics... Taking all their parents' money for expensive treatments and shooting up insulin all day. If they don't shoot up daily, they die. That seems to me like a pretty black and white way that "reality" is telling them to just piss off already.

    Your modern philosophy isn't based on current medical knowledge about addiction, and your understanding of the sociological processes that cause people to become addicts is shoddy at best.

    Read Howard Becker's "On Becoming A Marijuana User" if you don't believe me. You can find it if you look... it's a 60 year old study. It's in our social psychology textbook. Supposedly you got an A in that class, so you obviously had to have seen it at some point. It outlines the social process that leads people to that first hit... and the second... and the third. I'm not going to reiterate his research for you.

    And the question, "If a person's free of social constraints and addiction, what are they searching for?" Is pretty damn silly. They're chasing the Dragon. *DUH*. But the presumption of that question, that people make their decisions completely free of social influences, is frankly embarrassing coming from a Sociology major. Seriously. You should know better by now.

    Do some drugs, read a book on drugs, talk to your doctor about drugs, or just spout bigotry. It makes no difference to me. I can't MAKE you think outside your pretty little box. But I'm not going to bash my head against a tree over and over again and hope someone with BLATANT prejudices is going to see another way of thinking. It's like arguing with a skinhead (and trust me, I've done that plenty, too, with exactly as much success as I'm having with you).

    I'm done going around in circles with someone who would rather be a philosopher than a scientist, or who thinks a life with a bottle straw and needle is the easy way out. Ask a junkie sometime what he'll do when he's outta cash and has nothing left to lose. If you think it's easy to live life with those memories, compulsions, destroyed relationships, and a seriously fucked up brain, well... Go for it. But don't preach your hatred around a recovering addict.

    I really do like you man, but in this instance I think you're a friggin idiot.

    You want some philosophy? "Don't judge a man until you've walked two moons in his moccasins."

    ReplyDelete

We welcome comments and insights from anyone who is willing to contribute, but please be respectful and courteous of all other users.